Skip to content
FORESTDEPTHS — A workshop for story worlds
Menu
SOCIETY & SHARED RULES

Civic dilemma lab

Give a public decision several reasonable positions and visible tradeoffs.

Free to use · Runs in your browser · Your drafts stay on your device

The worked example and full guide are readable without JavaScript. Enable JavaScript to generate, customize, or save a brief.

Set your conditions

Every setting shapes the brief. Try changing one at a time.

More control

1: compact · 2: developed · 3: second-order consequences

Share links contain all entered settings, including draft context. Review before sharing.

FROM CONDITIONS TO CONSEQUENCES

Your story seedlings

Open notebook

A worked example to begin with. Adjust the conditions to make it yours.

WORKED EXAMPLE · Civic dilemma lab

The Orchard Assembly

Social design brief

The orchard ballot asks whether produce should be divided by household or by hours worked. Both answers overlook a resident who cannot currently work and has no registered household. Do not reveal this person only as a rhetorical example in a speech. Give them a practical task and a preference about distribution, so the discussion includes their agency as well as their need. Begin just before a public decision involving a council deciding how to share an old orchard. Set it in a wayhouse at the edge of a living woodland, where the keeper’s limited store of guiding light cannot be taken for granted. Give the shared rule a useful purpose and an unevenly distributed burden.

Decision worksheet

Resource: water. Process: assembly. Constraint: short deadline. Write one position that protects continuity, one that corrects an exclusion, and one that prioritizes immediate need. Give every position a measurable cost. Choose a reversible first step, name who implements it, and set the event that will trigger a review.

Pressure & blind spot

The orchard ballot may offer two clear options and still frame the problem badly. Household registration and hours worked both omit some legitimate needs. Introduce the overlooked resident before a speaker uses them as an example. Give that person an opinion about collection times or storage, not only a vulnerability that proves somebody else’s argument. The pressure is that a familiar solution no longer fits the available time. Under pressure, the central person uses a simple rule that excludes seasonal workers. Use this as a mistake the story can examine, rather than an instruction to endorse it.

A choice with a cost

Water requires a continuing service, space permits several uses at different times, and repair funds turn choices into a sequence of priorities. Test a response in which the central person creates a temporary arrangement with a review date. Then test a smaller version before making a permanent promise. Decide who contributes the time, access, or trust required; do not make that contribution disappear at the scene break.

Scene anchor

Bring a tally sheet kept beside a basket of fruit into contact with leaves pressed into the margin of a hand-drawn map. Follow a newcomer applying the rule, then show who has authority to revise it. Allow the viewpoint to revise an earlier interpretation after a concrete observation. Keep the decision between two or three people; show its effect in a changed daily habit.

Next writing move

Draft three allocations and attach a concrete cost to each. Then choose a temporary policy and write the first complaint it receives at the point of delivery. Arrange the premise as an opening action, a difficult choice, and an observable consequence. What ordinary labor keeps the extraordinary system working? Fair process requires more than giving everyone the same number of minutes.

Fictional writing material · Local rule-based generation

Creative proposals, not factual research. Generated locally from purpose-specific rules. Names and ideas are not exclusive.

BEYOND THE GENERATOR

Put this brief to work.

Read the deeper guide

The Orchard Assembly: a complete fictional story

The orchard ballot asks whether produce should be divided by household or by hours worked. Both answers overlook a resident who cannot currently work and has no registered household. Do not reveal this person only as a rhetorical example in a speech. Give them a practical task and a preference about distribution, so the discussion includes their agency as well as their need.

ORIGINAL FICTION · A COMPLETE SCENE

The Tally Beside the Fruit

The Orchard Assembly set its tally beside a basket of early fruit. Dividing by household looked equal. Dividing by hours worked looked earned. Both proposals fitted the page more comfortably than the lives outside the room. Several seasonal workers were absent because their shift overlapped the vote. A resident without a registered household had arrived early and was helping wash the fruit nobody had yet agreed how to share.

A council member nearly called the visible majority an answer. Then she noticed the names on the work list that never appeared on the attendance sheet. “Could we hear their account before choosing the rule?” she asked. Somebody complained that waiting would spoil the harvest. The fruit really did have a limited interval. Urgency mattered; it did not make missing evidence become consent.

They gathered the available accounts and proposed a temporary division for this harvest, with a review date after distribution. The arrangement considered work, household use, and needs the two original categories missed. It satisfied neither faction completely. The resident washing fruit asked a practical question about collection time, returning the discussion from grand fairness to how a share would actually reach a person.

The council recorded the scope and disagreement beside the tally. Fruit left the basket under a rule that could be inspected without claiming to settle every future harvest. A worker arriving late questioned one allocation. The member showed the reasons and added the objection for review, rather than treating distribution as proof that the discussion was already over. Some fruit bruised during the delay; that cost stayed in the account too.

At review, the basket was empty and the consequences less abstract. The council could compare what households received, who collected late, and which assumptions had failed. The temporary rule changed. Nobody unveiled a final definition of fairness. Under the orchard trees, the next season had begun quietly, indifferent to the attractiveness of a tally that forgot the people too busy to stand beside it.

What this particular story makes visible

The fruit's perishability gives deliberation a genuine deadline. Missing workers are evidence gaps, not rhetorical decorations. A temporary, reasoned distribution resolves the immediate action while preserving a route for disagreement informed by what the rule actually did.

A different choice, a different cost

Have an additional account arrive after distribution. Use the stated review to address the effect instead of pretending that a fair process guarantees complete information before every deadline.

Trace the purpose, pressure, choice, and result

The immediate purpose

The orchard council wants the next harvest allocated fairly.

The pressure that changes the task

An equal-looking rule excludes workers absent during the vote.

The decision

A member adds their account to the tally and proposes a temporary division.

The resulting situation

Fruit is distributed under a review date, not a permanent declaration of fairness.

A decision gains legitimacy through evidence and a revisable scope.
A check on this particular fictional case

The particular reasoning

The orchard ballot may offer two clear options and still frame the problem badly. Household registration and hours worked both omit some legitimate needs. Introduce the overlooked resident before a speaker uses them as an example. Give that person an opinion about collection times or storage, not only a vulnerability that proves somebody else’s argument.

A fair hearing requires more than identical speaking slots. Some participants need translation, records, time away from work, or an accessible way to submit a correction. Choose one concrete obstacle and follow its effect into the decision. Listing every possible inequity can overwhelm the scene; one well-staged mechanism can change how readers interpret the entire vote.

Distinguish an allocation from its delivery. A temporary policy can be reasonable and still produce a missed collection or ambiguous label. Give the decision a review trigger and a person who can receive a complaint. This preserves uncertainty without reducing public action to permanent indecision or a single triumphant speech.

Fair process requires more than giving everyone the same number of minutes.
The editorial question this tool tests

Three controls with different consequences

Resource

Water requires a continuing service, space permits several uses at different times, and repair funds turn choices into a sequence of priorities.

waterpublic spacerepair funds

Decision

Assemblies expose speaking access, rotating councils expose continuity, and ballots expose who writes the available options.

assemblyrotating councilpublic ballot

Constraint

A deadline restricts consultation, uneven evidence affects confidence, and limited labor can undermine an otherwise generous decision.

short deadlineuneven evidencelimited labor

Decision worksheet

Resource: water. Process: assembly. Constraint: short deadline. Write one position that protects continuity, one that corrects an exclusion, and one that prioritizes immediate need. Give every position a measurable cost. Choose a reversible first step, name who implements it, and set the event that will trigger a review.

A decision gains legitimacy through evidence and a revisable scope.

A response to question; a different practice to test

A VERSION TO QUESTION

The central person uses a simple rule that excludes seasonal workers.

A DIFFERENT PRACTICE TO TEST

The central person creates a temporary arrangement with a review date.

In this case, the practical difference is visible after the decision: Fruit is distributed under a review date, not a permanent declaration of fairness.

An original passage, revised through this tool

The council wanted a fair way to share the orchard's fruit. There were many different opinions, and the issue was complicated. Finally, the members listened carefully and chose a reasonable compromise that everyone could understand.
An explanatory first pass
The tally sheet gave each household the same portion. A worker set an empty basket beside it. “Which line is for the people pruning on the day you counted?” The chair looked at the columns, then at the basket. She wrote a temporary allocation below the total and circled a date. One member still folded the old sheet into his pocket.
A scene that makes the turning point observable

The basket gives the missing claim a physical place beside the count. The proposal remains provisional, so the scene need not prove that one meeting discovers permanent fairness. The dissenting member is not required to become satisfied before action proceeds. A review date creates a future test, while the written allocation lets readers distinguish the decision from the chair's general intentions.

Follow one portion into an ordinary household task. Show a real benefit and one remaining objection. If the compromise changes nobody's available work or supply, the council scene will sound thoughtful while leaving its public stakes abstract and untestable.

A collective name makes a claim someone should be able to question

Continue with the societies foundation to compare this case with the broader craft method.

Write the observable turning point

Draft three allocations and attach a concrete cost to each. Then choose a temporary policy and write the first complaint it receives at the point of delivery.

Keep the immediate purpose visible: The orchard council wants the next harvest allocated fairly. Put the decisive observation before the choice: A member adds their account to the tally and proposes a temporary division.

At the end, check this particular result: Fruit is distributed under a review date, not a permanent declaration of fairness. A decision gains legitimacy through evidence and a revisable scope.